![]() ![]() Guarantee you aren't missing crucial references through choice of search expression.Smith" or, if the term is put in quotes, "John Michael Smith" and "Smith, John") (E.g., a search for a specific John Smith may pick up many "John Smiths" who aren't the one meant, many pages containing "John" and "Smith" separately, and also miss out all the useful references indexed under "J. Guarantee that the results reflect the uses you mean, rather than other uses.Guarantee why something is mentioned a lot, and that it isn't due to marketing, reposting as an internet meme, spamming, or self-promotion, rather than importance.Guarantee the results are reliable or "true" (search engines index whatever text people choose to put online, true or false).Search more specifically within certain websites, or for combined and alternative phrases (or excluding certain words and phrases that would otherwise confuse the results). ![]() See also here to calculate statistical significance. For example, a Google search for "the green goldfish", with quotes, in 2021 initially reports around 209,000 results, yet on paging through to the last search results page shows the returned number of hits to be 303. Note, however, that Google searches may report vastly more hits than will ever be returned to the user, especially for exact quoted expressions. Confirm roughly how popularly referenced an expression is.Often provide full cited copies of source documents.Confirm "who's reported to have said what" according to sources (useful for neutral citing).Provide information and lead to pages that assist with the above goals.What a search test can do, and what it can'tĪ search engine can index pages and text which others have placed on the internet, just like a big index at the back of a book. In most cases, a search engine test is a first-pass heuristic or " rule of thumb". For example, it describes Google Groups (usenet groups), Google scholar (academia), Google news, and Google books.ĭepending on the subject matter, and how carefully it is used, a search engine test can be very effective and helpful, or produce misleading or non-useful results. This page mostly uses Google instead of Bing or Yahoo, but aims for generality where it can. These adapt your query to many search engines. Several generalized search engines exist. Specialized search engines exist for medicine, science, news and law amongst others. The most common search engines are at Google, Bing, and Yahoo. The distinct advantages of each are their user interface and, less obviously, their algorithms for compiling and searching their own indexes.īecause a web crawler can be blocked-specific ones or just in general-different search engines can list different web sites, and there are more web sites available by URL than are indexed in any database. The advantages of a specific search engine can be distinguished by using a variety of common search engines. This page describes both these web search tests and the web search tools that can help develop Wikipedia, and it describes their biases and their limitations. Copyrighting – Identify whether material is copied, and if so, check the licensing.Names and terminology – Identify the names used for things (including alternative names and terminology).Information – Review the reliability of facts and citations.Existence – Discover what sources (including websites) actually exist for possible presentation.Notability – Decide whether a page should be nominated for deletion.Genuineness – Identify a spurious hoax or an urban legend.Popularity – See Google's trending tool below.Depending on the type of query and kind of search engine, this variety can open up to a single author. As presentations and deletions progress, this variety of choices for input tend to produce the desired objective- a neutral viewpoint. Discerning the reliability of the source material is an especially core skill for using the web, while the wiki itself only facilitates the creation of multiple drafts. There is a high demand for reliability on Wikipedia. Search engine results can help editors retain (what is notable) or delete (what is not verifiable) source material, depending on their reliability. However, discerning that information may require insight. Possibly useful items on the results list include the source material or the electronic tools that a web site can provide, such as a dictionary, but the list itself, as a whole, can also indicate important information. This facilitates research by offering an immediate variety of applicable options. Web searches test the understanding of the WP:Five pillars of Wikipedia.Ī search engine lists web pages on the Internet. What's hard is knowing what it is you're measuring and what your measurement can mean. This page in a nutshell: Measuring is easy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |